Logs for jdev
[00:11:39] * MattJ left the chat.
[01:34:02] * luca tagliaferri left the chat.
[04:36:48] * Treebilou joined the chat.
[05:58:48] * Link Mauve joined the chat.
[06:40:44] * gigam joined the chat.
[06:49:28] * gigam left the chat.
[06:50:45] * scippio joined the chat.
[06:50:55] * sezuan left the chat.
[06:50:57] * sezuan joined the chat.
[07:06:41] * sezuan left the chat.
[07:06:43] * sezuan joined the chat.
[07:10:54] * sezuan left the chat.
[07:10:56] * sezuan joined the chat.
[07:29:55] * Vincent V. joined the chat.
[07:35:45] * Kev_ joined the chat.
[08:29:45] * Tobias joined the chat.
[08:58:14] * Zash joined the chat.
[09:28:41] * harrykar left the chat.
[09:29:51] * harrykar joined the chat.
[09:50:12] * guus joined the chat.
[09:50:20] * scippio left the chat.
[09:55:35] * Alex joined the chat.
[11:20:35] * Zash left the chat.
[11:29:40] * Zash joined the chat.
[11:36:36] * scippio joined the chat.
[11:52:55] * scippio left the chat.
[11:53:12] * scippio joined the chat.
[12:01:48] * MattJ joined the chat.
[12:05:50] * pstadler joined the chat.
[12:20:17] * scippio left the chat.
[12:20:32] * scippio joined the chat.
[12:29:57] * luca tagliaferri joined the chat.
[12:32:32] * scippio left the chat.
[12:32:39] * scippio joined the chat.
[12:40:25] <Zash> (Why) is STARTTLS better than just SSL directly?
[12:40:37] <Kev_> Multi-hosting, for one.
[12:41:22] <Zash> Securitywise then?
[12:41:40] <Kev_> As far as I know they're equivalent, but I know almost nothing.
[12:45:48] <MattJ> I think if SNI had been around from the start, I double STARTTLS would have gained traction at all
[12:45:58] <MattJ> I doubt
[12:47:11] <Kev_> Although, it's still negotiation, so...
[12:47:24] <Kev_> I mean, it's better to know whether a service supports TLS, rather than blindly trying.
[12:47:37] <Zash> MattJ: implicit or explicit?
[12:47:48] <Zash> Kev_: Diffrent port!!
[12:48:17] <MattJ> Worked for HTTP :P
[12:48:26] <Kev_> Yes, for really large values of 'worked'.
[12:50:31] * Zash left the chat.
[13:03:51] <dwd> StartTLS, as a design, reduced port consumption (a hot issue around RFC 2595), and also allowed better application selection
between TLS and the encryption capabilities of various SASL mechanisms. In the end, SASL encryption hasn't really been used
much, however.
[13:15:12] * Alex left the chat.
[13:32:41] * Zash joined the chat.
[13:35:28] * pstadler left the chat.
[14:03:13] * Zash left the chat.
[14:33:26] * gigam joined the chat.
[14:33:49] * gigam left the chat.
[15:02:22] * naw joined the chat.
[15:10:34] * gigam joined the chat.
[15:11:07] * darkrain_ joined the chat.
[15:14:48] * gigam left the chat.
[15:14:48] * gigam joined the chat.
[15:16:39] * naw left the chat.
[15:21:30] * sezuan left the chat.
[15:21:31] * sezuan joined the chat.
[15:25:59] * sezuan left the chat.
[15:26:02] * sezuan joined the chat.
[15:26:37] * sezuan left the chat.
[15:56:05] * Alex joined the chat.
[15:56:09] * Alex left the chat.
[15:58:35] * Alex joined the chat.
[16:04:30] * xnyhps left the chat.
[16:04:39] * xnyhps joined the chat.
[16:14:30] * Florob joined the chat.
[16:30:06] * Alex left the chat.
[16:30:57] * psa joined the chat.
[16:33:04] * gigam left the chat.
[16:33:06] * Kev_ left the chat.
[16:51:40] * guus left the chat.
[16:56:36] * Florob left the chat.
[16:56:37] * Florob joined the chat.
[16:59:27] * fippo joined the chat.
[17:00:06] * fippo left the chat.
[17:00:22] * fippo joined the chat.
[17:00:27] * fippo left the chat.
[17:14:45] * bjc joined the chat.
[17:51:26] * Florob left the chat.
[17:54:58] <Tobias> should vCard requests for MUC occupants always go to the in-room-JID, even if the real-JID is available in non-anonymous rooms?
[17:55:38] <psa> I'd say, if you have the real JID then use it
[17:56:07] <Kev> I wouldn't.
[17:56:52] <Kev> If it's a non-anonymous room (that is you know that the other party also has your JID), it's safe to use a real JID, but what
if you know their JID and they don't know yours?
[17:57:58] <Tobias> Kev, ahh..you think admins might expose their JID when requesting vCards of visitors via real-JID?
[17:58:16] <Kev> Right.
[17:58:30] <Tobias> then it's probably best to go via in-room JID always
[18:01:27] * naw joined the chat.
[18:03:29] * mathieui joined the chat.
[18:14:41] * scippio left the chat.
[18:25:38] <MattJ> Gajim had that bug
[18:25:56] <MattJ> Which led to someone I banned from here taking revenge on my account
[18:26:14] <Kev> Down below 50 threads in my inbox \o/
[18:27:31] <Tobias> is this mention in MUC XEP?
[18:27:37] <Tobias> is this mentioned in MUC XEP?
[18:27:53] <Kev> I don't think so, I was just quite pleased - was 300odd earlier.
[18:30:32] <psa> Tobias: Fabio Forno brought up this issue a while back on one of the mailing lists but we never wrote a little best practices
spec about it
[18:30:50] <Tobias> psa, so this would go into a dedicated XEP?
[18:31:40] <Kev> We should extend XEP-0045 :D
[18:31:45] <psa> Tobias: or into XEP-0045 -- I don't particularly have a preference
[18:31:54] <psa> Kev: it would likely be a few paragraphs
[18:32:38] <Tobias> hehe
[18:55:34] * luca tagliaferri left the chat.
[19:02:10] * Link Mauve left the chat.
[19:04:29] * Link Mauve joined the chat.
[20:31:40] * Zash joined the chat.
[20:31:56] * Zash left the chat.
[20:38:41] * guus joined the chat.
[20:39:58] * luca tagliaferri joined the chat.
[20:45:41] * Treebilou left the chat.
[20:56:29] * deryni left the chat.
[22:00:17] * Alex joined the chat.
[22:00:52] * deryni joined the chat.
[22:30:33] * bjc left the chat.
[22:41:36] * Alex left the chat.
[22:49:56] * MattJ left the chat.
[22:50:04] * MattJ joined the chat.
[23:06:42] * guus left the chat.
[23:41:54] * psa left the chat.