Logs for jdev
[00:17:26] * mcepl joined the chat.
[02:34:49] * lastsky joined the chat.
[02:59:28] * jcea left the chat.
[03:30:23] * teo joined the chat.
[04:24:38] * darkrain joined the chat.
[04:44:29] * lastsky left the chat.
[04:44:30] * lastsky joined the chat.
[04:46:29] * lastsky left the chat.
[04:48:36] * lastsky joined the chat.
[05:02:29] * Treebilou left the chat.
[05:02:32] * Treebilou joined the chat.
[05:03:29] * Treebilou left the chat.
[05:03:33] * Treebilou joined the chat.
[05:07:51] * lastsky left the chat.
[05:51:50] * teo left the chat.
[05:55:50] * teo joined the chat.
[06:58:25] * Destructhor joined the chat.
[07:11:11] * Alex joined the chat.
[07:14:53] * MattJ left the chat.
[07:25:32] * luca tagliaferri joined the chat.
[07:28:28] * scippio left the chat.
[07:38:26] * Wojtek joined the chat.
[07:38:57] * Wojtek left the chat.
[07:42:32] * tkoski joined the chat.
[07:42:40] * tkoski left the chat.
[07:53:22] * Destructhor left the chat.
[07:58:29] * Xificurk joined the chat.
[08:00:11] * teo left the chat.
[08:00:11] * teo joined the chat.
[08:11:12] * po joined the chat.
[08:16:06] * nabatt joined the chat.
[08:20:39] * Destructhor joined the chat.
[08:26:18] * Alex left the chat.
[08:41:33] * Tobias joined the chat.
[08:44:21] * Hermitifier joined the chat.
[08:44:29] <Hermitifier> Hello.
[08:44:46] <Hermitifier> I implemented verification of entity caps hash.
[08:45:46] <Hermitifier> What do I do about clients which reply to service discovery with duplicate features?
[08:46:16] <Hermitifier> Locally, they collapse into one, and hash doesn't match anymore.
[08:47:01] * rtreffer left the chat.
[08:49:49] * petermount joined the chat.
[08:52:09] <Tobias> Hermitifier, what client is that, with the duplicate hashes?
[08:52:54] <Hermitifier> So far, Tkabber and Jabbim
[08:53:05] <Hermitifier> But I think I got it.
[08:54:31] <Hermitifier> The wording in XEP seems wrong - "more than one service discovery feature with the same XML character data" is ill-formed
[08:54:44] <Hermitifier> Do empty tags even have character data?
[08:58:20] * mcepl left the chat.
[09:09:54] * rtreffer joined the chat.
[09:12:22] <Tobias> they don't
[09:12:48] * mcepl joined the chat.
[09:13:27] * scippio joined the chat.
[09:15:24] <Hermitifier> So strictly speaking, no reply is ever well-formed - all features have the same empty data. Or because they have no data it
cannot be compared as "same"?
[09:15:50] * mcepl left the chat.
[09:19:57] <Link Mauve> Where is defined the possibility to put two stanzas in an unique TCP packet, one after the other? Or how is it named?
[09:23:05] <Hermitifier> Link Mauve: "buffering"?
[09:23:31] <Link Mauve> Hmm, yes. ^^'
[09:23:35] <Link Mauve> Thanks Hermitifier. :)
[09:25:19] * Destructhor left the chat.
[09:31:36] * rtreffer left the chat.
[09:31:47] * rtreffer joined the chat.
[09:41:59] * Destructhor joined the chat.
[11:04:42] * luca tagliaferri left the chat.
[11:27:15] * sonny joined the chat.
[11:56:25] * luca tagliaferri joined the chat.
[12:16:10] * teo left the chat.
[12:51:01] * teo joined the chat.
[13:20:42] * teo left the chat.
[13:20:43] * teo joined the chat.
[13:21:44] * teo left the chat.
[13:21:45] * teo joined the chat.
[13:22:49] * sonny left the chat.
[13:28:19] * sonny joined the chat.
[13:49:31] * Destructhor left the chat.
[13:51:30] * Destructhor joined the chat.
[13:52:37] * teo left the chat.
[14:00:41] * aRyo joined the chat.
[14:02:07] * naw joined the chat.
[14:21:41] * wjt joined the chat.
[14:25:01] <wjt> Can anyone decipher this paragraph of http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0004.html#protocol-formtypes ? I think it's saying:
• If I send you <iq><foo><form type='submit'/></foo></iq>, then your reply must be inside a <foo> too;
• Your IQ reply must … be a reply;
• type=submit and type=cancel should be in <iq type='set'/>; type=result and type=form should be in <iq type='result'/>.
But I'm not really sure on the first bullet :)
“For <iq/> stanzas, the root element qualified by the "wrapper" namespace in a form of type "form" or "submit" MUST be returned
in a form of type "result". The <x/> element qualified by the 'jabber:x:data' namespace MUST be a child of the "wrapper" namespace's
root element. As defined in XMPP Core [8], the 'id' attribute MUST be copied in the IQ result. For data forms of type "form"
or "result", the <iq/> stanza SHOULD be of type "result". For data forms of type "submit" or "cancel", the <iq/> stanza SHOULD
be of type "set".
[14:28:28] * elmex joined the chat.
[14:29:17] <petermount> hmmm
[14:29:40] * scippio left the chat.
[14:32:07] <petermount> ah found it. Normally I'd say yes but knew I say this
[14:32:43] <petermount> in xep-0045 7.10 is an example that doesn't go with that first bullet
[14:33:27] <petermount> i.e. request
<iq from='hag66@shakespeare.lit/pda'
id='reg1'
to='coven@chat.shakespeare.lit'
type='get'>
<query xmlns='jabber:iq:register'/>
</iq>
& successful response
<iq from='coven@chat.shakespeare.lit'
id='reg2'
to='hag66@shakespeare.lit/pda'
type='result'/>
[14:33:32] <petermount> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#register
[14:34:22] <petermount> say=saw my typing is bad for some reason today :-(
[14:35:36] <wjt> right. there's no reason why a form submission needs a form back of type result
[14:37:29] <petermount> I think that's down to both the spec using the form & the implementation.
[14:38:10] <petermount> For example I do use adhoc-commands but I've not yet found a client that actually complies to that spec when it comes to results
:-/
[14:38:51] <wjt> i'm not surprised :)
[15:00:48] * MattJ joined the chat.
[15:02:31] * nabatt left the chat.
[15:03:02] * aRyo left the chat.
[15:03:27] * aRyo joined the chat.
[15:18:38] * sonny left the chat.
[15:18:56] * wjt left the chat.
[15:49:36] * alkino joined the chat.
[15:51:43] * teo joined the chat.
[16:06:50] * Florob joined the chat.
[16:18:48] * aRyo left the chat.
[16:22:00] * Florob left the chat.
[16:22:40] * Florob joined the chat.
[16:40:50] * rtreffer left the chat.
[16:53:03] * darkrain_ joined the chat.
[17:00:32] * luca tagliaferri left the chat.
[17:09:55] * rtreffer joined the chat.
[17:16:17] * petermount left the chat.
[17:24:28] * tsudot joined the chat.
[17:27:20] * teo left the chat.
[17:27:20] * teo joined the chat.
[17:30:25] * po left the chat.
[17:32:47] * Siosm joined the chat.
[17:54:26] * teo left the chat.
[17:58:37] * sonny joined the chat.
[18:00:04] * teo joined the chat.
[18:10:47] * teo left the chat.
[18:10:47] * teo joined the chat.
[18:28:29] * sonny left the chat.
[18:34:54] * Florob left the chat.
[18:34:58] * Florob joined the chat.
[18:58:16] * Fantomas joined the chat.
[18:59:01] * Fantomas left the chat.
[19:09:02] * luca tagliaferri joined the chat.
[19:32:50] * Asterix joined the chat.
[19:37:32] * tsudot left the chat.
[20:00:43] * Wojtek joined the chat.
[20:11:31] * sonny joined the chat.
[20:13:13] * mlundblad_netbook joined the chat.
[20:16:57] * sonny left the chat.
[20:29:21] * justin joined the chat.
[21:05:19] * justin left the chat.
[21:13:40] * rtreffer left the chat.
[21:20:06] * mlundblad_netbook left the chat.
[21:21:13] * naw left the chat.
[21:45:33] * xnyhps left the chat.
[21:46:17] * xnyhps joined the chat.
[22:02:18] * Siosm left the chat.
[22:17:15] * Florob left the chat.
[22:21:29] * Wojtek left the chat.
[22:29:06] * alkino left the chat.
[22:42:01] * Asterix left the chat.
[22:47:55] * Tobias left the chat.
[23:24:54] * Florob joined the chat.
[23:40:55] * Florob left the chat.